Skip to main content

Sepsis Huddle

Sepsis Huddle (can be initiated by any member of the care team at any time when there is a concern)

  • Intended to identify evidence of organ dysfunction

  • Conduct huddle at beside, if possible

  • Discuss clinical exam findings including vital sign review and available laboratory data to determine status (focused history and physical)

  • Discuss therapeutic interventions and end therapy goals

Care Area Emergency Department Inpatient PICU
Huddle Resources
  • Sepsis Alert-ED RN
  • Sepsis Alert-ED Provider
  • Sepsis Alert-Inpatient RN
  • Sepsis Secondary Nursing Screen
 
Changes in a patient's clinical status can occur at any time, frequent assessment is indicated

 

Sepsis Alert-ED RN Sepsis Alert-ED RN

 

Sepsis Alert-ED Provider Sepsis Alert-ED Provider

Sepsis Alert-Inpatient RN

Sepsis Alert-Inpatient Provider

For inpatient nurses, there is a Sepsis Secondary Nursing Screen form to complete once an alert is received. The form is scored. If the score is ≥ 2, the inpatient provider is alerted. If the score is < 2, the inpatient provider will NOT receive the alert. 

Proposed Reference Values to Identify Age-Based Vital Sign Abnormalities
Age Tachycardia Systolic BP Diastolic BP Tachypnea
  (beats per minute) (mmHg) (mmHg) (breaths per minute)
1 month - 1 year > 180 < 75 < 30 > 60
> 1 - 5 years > 140 < 74 < 35 > 40
> 5 - 12 years > 130 < 83 < 45 > 30
> 12 - 18 years > 110 < 90 < 50 > 30
Remember, heart rate can be affected by pain, anxiety, medications, and hydration status

References

Bonfide, C.P., Brady, P.W., Keren, R., Conway, P.H., Marsolo, K., & Daymont, C. (2013). Development of heart and respiratory rate percentile curves for hospitalized children. Pediatrics, 131(4), e1150-1157. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-2443

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (2023). Signs and symptoms concerning for sepsis and septic shock. https://www.chop.edu/clinical-pathway/sepsis-emergency-department-inpatient-picu-clinical-pathway

Davis, A.L., Carcillo, J.S., Aneja, R.K., Deymann, A.J., Lin, J.C., Nguyen, T.C., Okuysen-Cawley, R.S., Relvas, M.S., Rozenfeld, R.A., Skippen, P.W., Stojadinovic, B.J., Williams, E.A., Yeh, T.S., Balamuth, F., Brierley, J., de Caen, A.R., Cheifetz, I.M., Choong, K., Conway, E., Jr, Cornell, T., ... Zuckerberg, A.L., (2017). American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock. Critical Care Medicine, 45(6), 1061-1093. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002425

Gebara, B.M. (2005). Values for systolic blood pressure. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 6(4), 500. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000164344.07588.83

Goldstein, B., Giroir, B., & Randolph, A. (2005). International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: Definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 6(1), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PCC.0000149131.72248.E6

These pathways do not establish a standard of care to be followed in every case. It is recognized that each case is different, and those individuals involved in providing health care are expected to use their judgment in determining what is in the best interests of the patient based on the circumstances existing at the time. It is impossible to anticipate all possible situations that may exist and to prepare a pathway for each. Accordingly, these pathways should guide care with the understanding that departures from them may be required at times.